Street Wonk #11: Charter Reform is Taking Shape
Salary Increases Announced... 2024 Candidate Guide Released... Final Vote on District Map Tonight... Who's Running...
Dear Readers,
The City of Portland is almost halfway through its two-year charter reform transition plan, and key details have emerged over the past month. There have also been some unsuccessful shenanigans at City Hall aimed at weakening our voter-approved change in City government. Although confusing to some current members of City Council, it’s pretty simple:
Charter Review & Reform Recap
To refresh your memory:
December 2020: The Portland Charter Commission is established with four members appointed by each City Commissioner and the Mayor. You can read about the Commissioners here.
June 14th, 2022: (Phase I) The Portland Charter Commission referred Measure 26-228—Changes to City Governance and Ranked-Choice Voting to the November 2022 ballot
October 2022: Commissioner Mapps Reveals Alternative to Charter Reform Measure (Portland Mercury) Because Measure 26-228 passed, this effort was abandoned
November 8th, 2022: Measure 26-228 was approved by over 58% of Portland voters
November 2022: The City of Portland Two Year Transition Plan begins
December 2022: The Charter Commission holds its last session
January 2023: The Charter Commission releases its final progress report.
January 19th, 2023: The Charter Commission presents its Phase II recommendations to Portland City Council. The Commission referred five measures to the November 2024 ballot and recommended six proposals to Portland City Council. Council immediately rejected the proposal to establish an Office of Transparency Advocate. I could not determine the current status of the other five before sending this out today.
Attempted Reform of Voter-Approved Reform
This disappointing display of ignorance and hubris when two members of our City Council attempted to hijack the voter-approved transition to a new form of government has gone down in flames. Meddling with the voter’s will is always a bad look, especially if you intend to run under the system you revised. I want to thank everyone who showed up on July 18th to give those clowns an earful. In case you missed it:
Portland Commissioners Rene Gonzalez, Dan Ryan float potential changes to city government overhaul (The Oregonian)
Updated: Commissioners' Proposal Could Throw a Wrench in Voter-Approved Charter Reform Plan (Portland Mercury)
Commissioners Push for Last-Minute Charter Reform Changes in Chaotic Work Session (Portland Mercury)
Good Morning, News: City Council's "Clown Car" Meeting (Portland Mercury) This summation from Portland Mercury is priceless:
“Dan Ryan was duplicitous and condescending (as usual); Carmen Rubio mostly just sat there, refusing to offer any full-throated opposition to this attack on democracy; Mingus Mapps was an energy vampire vomiting empty platitudes and meaningless word salads, Rene Gonzalez (with help his typo-ridden, malfunctioning slide show) embarrassed himself with the laughable, insulting assertion that Portland can't produce "12 quality candidates" to sit on Council; and most shockingly of all, Mayor Ted Wheeler was the only sane voice on Council who actually said out loud that this venture was a terrible waste of time, and that Council should be working to get charter reform implemented—JUST AS VOTERS TOLD THEM TO IN THE FIRST PLACE. "
Voting Districts
Charter Reform: District Commission Moving Ahead With Voting Map Combining Sellwood With West Side (Portland Mercury)
Independent District Commission Meeting #12: Tonight at 6 pm! Tune in or attend in person for the Commission’s final meeting, where they’re expected to vote to adopt an amended version of the “Alder” map. Each of the four districts has roughly equivalent populations. The amendment will group Sellwood with the West Side in District 4. I’m in District 3, how about you?
Salaries
I followed some of the outcry following the Portland Independent Salary Commission’s proposal, which was first released in June. While I understand the public’s reaction to high salaries for public officials, I generally support these pay increases. Their final proposal has decreased Commissioners’ salaries by about $10K from their initial recommendation.
The most important reason for offering a “thriving wage” is to make these jobs accessible to a broad spectrum of individuals. In cities, counties, and states across the country, many public offices pay so little that only people who are affluent, have a spouse to support them, or are retired can afford to serve. Low compensation excludes otherwise qualified candidates and discourages others unwilling to take a significant pay cut. We need only look to Salem to see how that’s been working out.
The wheels of progress may turn slowly, but that doesn’t mean that serving on City Council isn’t a grind. The job consistently requires well over 40 hours a week, and Commissioners are virtually never off the clock. For instance, I was frequently called on for evenings and weekend commitments during vacations (which were short and far between) and even while my son was hospitalized with a life-threatening illness.
Finally, because half of Americans are so poorly paid, we have a warped perception of what fair compensation is. I’m less concerned with Commissioners being paid a salary commensurate with their job requirements than I am with whether they support raising wages for the rest of us.
Portland politicians will see pay hike after 2024 election (Oregon Public Broadcasting)
How to Run
Here’s the official Candidate Guide for your perusal!
City of Portland Candidate Guide November 2024 (PortlandOregon.gov)
Who is running so far?
The first day to file to run for City Office is June 5th, 2024. However, a few names have emerged via the Small Donor Election Program, which requires a separate filing. I’ve also June 5thfrom a few other promising potential candidates, but they haven’t officially thrown their hats in the ring, so I’ll keep a lid on them for now.
Steph Routh for District #1: I’ll be releasing a voter’s guide in September 2024—I want a chance to consider all candidates—but I have little doubt that Steph Routh, at turns a small business owner, nonprofit leader, community organizer, and teacher, will be in my top three. Go Steph!
Sandeep Bali for District #2: Like every armchair activist, this pro-business, pro-cop candidate has a lot of feelings and opinions about what’s wrong with Portland but comes up short on analysis or policy solutions. Opposes right-sizing the police budget and investing in community initiatives, opposes inclusionary zoning.
Chris Flanary for District #3: I think I know who Chris is (city worker and union organizer?), but I couldn’t locate a campaign website or page for them, so I’ll reserve comment until I can confirm.
Mingus Mapps for Mayor: It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of my former opponent, so I mean this with all sincerity—have I missed something? What impressive administrative or legislative feats has he achieved that would warrant a run for Mayor? Exactly how long does one get to fail upwards and dine out on a Ph.D. in Political Science without accomplishing anything else of note? Besides the police union, big business advocates, and a certain demographic of neighborhood association members, who likes this guy? A mediocre bureaucrat turned mediocre Commissioner now wants to be a mediocre Mayor. I genuinely hope some stellar candidates step up. Portland deserves better.
Dear Chole, and people who support Street Wonk. What are your thoughts on candidate endorsements and slate cards?
I'm curious and have questions. Are you willing to talk about the history of candidate Steph Routh, her recent employer and history and values?
It feels like you are supporting a public dialog about candidates, and I know you want people to be informed about the facts on candidates who crafts and votes on housing laws. If this is not the proper forum for sharing facts would you rather have this somewhere else?
Steph Routh is connected to the YIMBY network of Sightline institute who ran an event sponsored by AirBnb. They match agendas perfectly. I'm curious how you can make your endorsement decision knowing this.
I think you are well aware of the harm that AirBNB inflicts on renters. I think you are also aware that Steph proudly worked for Sightline.
Facts: Sightline staff own a condo where YIMBY developer Eli Spevak evicted black section 8 renters on Albina. This up zoning is the mission of Sightline and YIMBYS. These are uncontested facts. Eli went on to found an up zone housing non profit called "Portland for everyone" This NGO had a similar housing mission as Sightline. See footnotes.
I think that it is safe to call this eviction gentrification a fact. It's not opinion. Black renters were evicted without apology as a means to promote density. Black lives were replaced with a BLM sign. But let's look deeper into that gentrification as part of the network of people who want to influence housing policy.
Sightline staff proudly put on a pro developer conference sponsored by AirBnb. Sightline staff proudly invited Eli to present at this conference. Eli has opposed rent control so has Sightline.
The sightline website is full of arguments against rent control or for creating weaker rent controls. See footnotes. Content warning for those who support stronger rent control.
You will not find sightline supporting taxes on empty units. See footnotes. You will find only 2 results if you search for "empty units" on their website. Again. Content warning. See footnotes.
Outside of the housing topic we have Steph's work in pedestrian safety.. Steph worked at Oregon Walks.
These are just facts: Oregon Walks was silent about any criticism of police. Police failed to cite the driver who killed Ben Carlson on a sidewalk. I lobbied Oregon Walks and the BTA on this topic. She did not use her time there to get this issue into the public eye, nor was any action taken. She directed my concerns to say she worked hard and gave an example of getting accidents called crashes. You will find nothing in the history of emails to members or their websites that talk about the lack of a citation in Ben's case. No call to action. It's a fact.
I'll end my presentation of facts and switch to opinion. I have known Steph back to Green Party volunteering in 2005. She is a nice person, but we need more than nice people in office. I feel we need people who don't aim to be popular or seek approval. As you read through the sightline website it becomes clear they are too close to Regan for me. Would anyone in a labor union agree that more jobs is "the only effective way" to give workers more power? That what Steph's coworkers write about giving power to renters. They say the quiet part out loud, and I don't see Steph making any rebuttals.. I feel anyone who worked for sightline or spoke at their YIMBYtown conference is not fit for any public office or work that touches the issue of housing.
Footnotes:
https://www.sightline.org/upzoning/
https://www.oregonlive.com/homes-rentals/2011/05/june_4_bus_tour_offers_a_taste.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asightline.org+%22rent+control%22
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Asightline.org+%22empty+units%22
https://www.sightline.org/2017/07/05/stop-blaming-foreign-home-buyers/
"In terms of rent, it matters little who owns an apartment building, because rents are primarily determined by what the market will bear"
https://www.sightline.org/2022/02/08/housing-is-popular/
"Vacancy is the only effective way to make landlords live in fear. It’s the same as the way lots of open jobs give more power to workers." Michael Andersen of Sightline
https://friends.org/about-us/programs/P4E
https://www.oregonlive.com/front-porch/2016/05/portland_for_everyone_housing.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20230814084903/http://www.orangesplot.net/staff/elis-bio/
https://yimby.town/sponsors/
https://www.facebook.com/stephanie.routh.5/posts/pfbid0btyxwcwZ4ACSyC7TzjRy23hhtePaEYGwucnsXtVgQfRfpY7DX4py6NUKVP6Dfxxjl
Not one of the 185 comments noted that sightline articles that downplay rent control and taxing empty units